English Korean Chinese
ホーム > 市場調査レポート > 医療機器 > 画像診断 > MRI:欧州の病院における市場規模と投資機会
カテゴリ
医療機器 (4750)
CT/MRI/X線 (172)
eヘルス (330)
カテーテル (239)
ディスポーザブル (77)
画像診断 (417)
核医学 (80)
眼科機器 (102)
歯科機器 (176)
心血管装置 (339)
整形外科 (341)
生体計測 (390)
創傷ケア (163)
体外診断装置 (552)
超音波 (55)
内視鏡 (160)
分子イメージング/造影剤 (28)
市場調査レポート

MRI:欧州の病院における市場規模と投資機会

MRI 2007: Market Size and Investment Potential in European Hospitals

発行 data information intelligence GmbH
出版日 商品コード 52700
ページ情報 英文 47 pages per country,50 tables per country
価格
US$ 630 換算 ¥ 50,834 (税抜) PDF (Czech Republic)
US$ 630 換算 ¥ 50,834 (税抜) PDF (Finland)
US$ 630 換算 ¥ 50,834 (税抜) PDF (Netherlands)
US$ 630 換算 ¥ 50,834 (税抜) PDF (Poland)
US$ 630 換算 ¥ 50,834 (税抜) PDF (Sweden)
US$ 1,050 換算 ¥ 84,724 (税抜) PDF (France)
US$ 1,050 換算 ¥ 84,724 (税抜) PDF (Germany)
US$ 1,050 換算 ¥ 84,724 (税抜) PDF (Italy)
US$ 1,050 換算 ¥ 84,724 (税抜) PDF (Russia)
US$ 1,050 換算 ¥ 84,724 (税抜) PDF (Spain)
US$ 7,560 換算 ¥ 610,016 (税抜) PDF (All Countries)


原文目次

Abstract

The information enable strategic planning for Marketing and Sales functions of suppliers of MRI systems to allow accurate projections for the market potential at segment level for own sales in the short to medium term future.

Interviews with 50% of all hospitals (in Germany, Poland and Russia also Imaging centers) regarding availability of radiography, digitalisation and investment plans, ca 20% of all hospitals provided input regarding, supplier, age, replacement. Hospitals with recent investment or investment plans provided input to buying processes and supplier selection criteria. Date collection took place from June 2006 - November 2006 in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Finland, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Czech Republic. Projections cover the next 3 years until 2009.

Methodology

dii has employed its Multi-Step-Approach methodology, which combines the benefits of large samples complemented by secondary research with the qualitative outcomes of in-depth interviews in order to achieve an optimal output.

Market Landscape Definition by Snapshot Telephone Interviews

Snapshot interviews allow the coverage of a large proportion of the total target population at reasonable cost by limiting the length of the questionnaire to max. 3 minutes. With this methodology, a statistically relevant number of hospitals can be assessed systematically to deliver the basis for exact projections on the installed base and the overall level of IT integration. The snapshot interviews are simultaneously used to select the most suitable respondents for further primary research.

Output:

  • Availability of Radiography
  • Customer Profile (Places of Installation, Size of Radiology)
  • Level of Digitalisation
  • Overall Investment Potential

Market Quantification by Quantitative Telephone Interviews

Based on the outcome of the snapshot interviews a smaller, yet statistically relevant or representative sample allows for accurate projections at segment level. Interviews last up to 30 minutes and cover all aspects for which quantification is required.

Output:

  • Installed Base (Market Size in Volume by Segment)
  • Supplier Market Shares
  • Future Investment Potential (Plans & Replacement Rate)
  • Equipment Utilisation

Sample sizes are statistically relevant in large countries allowing for samples of around 100 respondents and representative - covering at least one quarter of institutions in all other countries.

Market Qualification by Qualitative In-depth Telephone Interviews

Low sample numbers of 10 to 20 respondents per country are sufficient to deliver qualitative information on market dynamics and influencing factors. Key interview partners are advanced hospitals and/or hospitals planning future investment.

Output:

  • Input into Sales Approach Refinement
  • Critical Success Factors
  • Areas for Improvement

Geographic Scope

The project covers following ten countries:

  • Germany
  • France
  • Italy
  • Spain
  • Poland
  • The Netherlands
  • Czech Republic
  • Russia (only five metropolitan areas!)
  • Sweden
  • Finland

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Project Objectives
  • 1.2 Methodology
  • 1.3 Geographic Scope
  • 1.4 Respondent Population & Data Reliability
  • 1.5 Analysis
  • 1.6 Report Structure

2. Executive Summary

  • 2.1 Overview
  • 2.2 MRT
  • 2.3 Service and Support
  • 2.4 Equipment Utilisation
  • 2.5 Purchasing, Selection and Financing Process

Part 1 - Market Landscape Definition

3. Radiography in Healthcare Institutions

  • 3.1 Availability of Radiography
  • 3.2 Alternatives to In-house Radiography and Radiology Departments
  • 3.3 Structure of Radiography in Healthcare Institutions

Part 2 - Market Quantification

4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI/MRT)

  • 4.1 Installed Base
    • 4.1.1 Number of Rooms
    • 4.1.2 Supplier Structure
    • 4.1.3 Age Profile and Expected Life Span
  • 4.2 Future Investment Potential & Plans
    • 4.2.1 Hospitals Offering Potential
    • 4.2.2 Number of Rooms and Key Reasons
    • 4.2.3 Supplier Trend
    • 4.2.4 Timing of Investment

5. Service and Support

  • 5.1 Usage of Service and Support Offerings with MRI Systems
  • 5.2 Service & Support Budgets and Spend
  • 5.3 Interest in Service & Support Offerings

Part 3 - Market Qualification

6. Equipment Utilisation

  • 6.1 Radiographic Examinations and Images
  • 6.2 Trends in Radiographic Examinations

7. Purchasing Process

  • 7.1 Stakeholders in the Decision Making Process
  • 7.2 Selection Process and Financing

8. Supplier Selection Criteria and Satisfaction

9. Appendices

  • 9.1 List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
  • 9.2 Statistical Terms and Definitions
    • 9.2.1 Statistical Terms
    • 9.2.2 Topic Related Terminology

Table of Figures

  • Fig. 1-1 Target Sample Size - Market Quantification (Sample C), All Countries
  • Fig. 1-2 Respondent Population by Project Step and by Target Segment, Czech Republic
  • Fig. 3-1 Radiography in Healthcare Institutions by Type Number of Institutions
  • Fig. 3-2 Alternatives to In-house Radiography and Radiology Departments Percentage of Institutions without Dedicated Radiology
  • Fig. 3-3 Radiologists in Inpatient Healthcare Institutions by Type
  • Fig. 3-4 Radiography Rooms Out- and Inside Radiology Departments
  • Fig. 3-5 Radiography Rooms in Clinical Specialities by Type of Institution Number of Institutions and Mean Number of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-1 Availability and Number of Rooms by Segment - MRI Percentage of Hospitals and Numbers
  • Fig. 4-2 Distribution of Rooms by Size and Ownership - MRI Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 4-3 Supplier Market Penetration - MRI Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 4-4 Supplier Shares by Segment - MRI Percentage of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-5 Supplier Shares - MRI Percentage and Number of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-6 Age Profile by Segment - MRI Range and Quartiles of Year of Installation
  • Fig. 4-7 Period of Installation of Rooms - MRI Percentage and Number of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-8 Expected Life Span - MRI Mean Expected Life Span in Years
  • Fig. 4-9 Investment Potential - MRI Number of Hospitals
  • Fig. 4-10 Investment Potential - MRI Number of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-11 Supplier Trend - MRI Percentage of Rooms
  • Fig. 4-12 Timing of Investment - MRI Number of Rooms
  • Fig. 5-1 Usage of Service & Support Offerings by Segment with MRI Installations Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 5-2 Provider of Service & Support for MRI Installations Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 5-3 Overall Service & Support Budgets and Spend Minimum, Mean, Median, Maximum per Institution
  • Fig. 5-4 Interest in Service & Support Offerings Mean Importance, Percentage of Hospitals Planning Investments
  • Fig. 6-1 Examinations per Day per Institution by Type and Segment Mean Number
  • Fig. 6-2 Daily Throughput per Room by Type and Segment Mean Number
  • Fig. 6-3 Contrast Media Usage by Segment - R&F, CT, MRI Percentage of Examinations and Total Number
  • Fig. 6-4 Trends in Radiographic Examinations by Segment Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 7-1 Differences in Decision Making Processes for Modalities and IT Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 7-2 Stakeholder Involvement by Phase of Decision Making Process Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 7-3 Stakeholder Influence in Group Decisions by Phase of Decision Making Process Mean Relative Weight in Percent
  • Fig. 7-4 Supplier Selection Method Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 7-5 Financing Method Percentage of Hospitals
  • Fig. 8-1 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance & Supplier Satisfaction Mean Rating, 1 to 5
  • Fig. 8-2 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance Mean, Median and Range of Rating, 1 to 5
  • Fig. 8-3 Supplier Selection Criteria Importance & Supplier Performance Mean Rating, 1 to 5
  • Fig. 9-1 Schematic for Radiographic Imaging Equipment
Back to Top